One thing I often do is write reviews – either for publications or for more internal musings (as an arts assessor for Arts Council England, for example). Either way, you write what you think and you put that out there. Continue reading
I’m having a real problem describing what I do at the moment. I was recently introduced at an event, and the chair of the panel I was speaking on just needed a quick sentence so she could do the honours. I’ve done my research, I’ve read the books. These kind of sentences shouldn’t begin: “well….”
Consultant, trainer, evaluator, researcher… none of these seem to adequately explain either the cultural sector in which I specialise or the creative approaches I take to the tasks that I deliver. The majority of my work is self-created – the rest responding to the opportunities of others. How do I try to put all of it into the standard time it takes a lift to go up two floors?
I’ve got three words I like, all beginning with C: Curator, Curious and Critic
Curator: I love this word and apply it to lots of the work I do. Not in the museum sense, but in a more content curation way; gathering things together, making selections and reframing them for a new audience.
Curious: being curious, staying curious. For this I have my long-term collaborator Sarah Pickthall of Cusp inc to thank. She taught me the art of always asking why, of digging deeper, of looking beyond the surface. And ohhh how much fun it is, how much more you learn, how much more you get. Can ‘being curious’ be a job? Again, it certainly describes much of my work.
I also love the quote from Alice in Wonderland: ‘ “Curiouser and curiouser!” Cried Alice (she was so much surprised, that for the moment she quite forgot how to speak good English).’ I know how she felt.
Critic: I am a critic; (hopefully) providing constructive and supportive commentary, analysis and comparison. I don’t like that the standard definition puts the negative usage first (‘a person who expresses an unfavourable opinion of something’) and the more positive one second (‘a person who judges the merits of artistic works’). It’s not always easy, the putting your head above the parapet role, but if you are clear about what you think I reckon you should be prepared to articulate it.
I prefer the spelling and sound of critique – but sadly its only applied to a process or a document (critiquer perhaps?)
What do you think then? Think I can get away with Curious Curator and Critiquer as a job title?